Iran relies on oil sales to China for nearly 90% of its export revenue, funding its nuclear and missile programs. The U.S. must crack down on the “Axis of Evasion,” using secondary sanctions and diplomatic pressure to cut off this financial lifeline.
Browsing: sanctions
Brodsky advocates for comprehensive pressure and targeted strikes to exploit regime fragility, while Citrinowicz warns military action would consolidate the regime and prefers sustained sanctions to force internal change. Both agree the regime’s long-term stability is doubtful.
Analytically, the dilemma is structural: politically untouchable subsidies distort the market and enable smuggling, while sanctions and systemic corruption prevent infrastructure investment. This traps Iran in a cycle where resource wealth fails to ensure domestic energy security.
Cuba serves as Russia’s gateway for exporting IT and testing non‑Western payment systems in Latin America. Though trade is modest, Moscow sees Havana as a vital geopolitical symbol; its loss would discredit Russia’s multipolar ambitions and damage its strategic credibility.
Iran’s widespread anti-regime unrest calls for a U.S. strategy linking sanctions relief to meaningful domestic reforms. Military intervention risks chaos, while diplomatic incentives could support a peaceful transition.
Iran faces its gravest test in decades as mass protests challenge the Islamic Republic amid economic collapse and regional setbacks. The regime’s survival now hinges on repression, resilience, and uncertain external pressure.
The analysis shows how Iran has adapted through sanctions evasion, eastward trade with China and Russia, de-dollarization, alternative banking systems, and welfare patronage networks that protect regime loyalists, ensuring state survival while shifting economic burdens onto the general population.
Russia’s shadow fleet of hundreds of aging, uninsured tankers is a strategic and environmental hazard. Countering it requires modern “commerce raiding”—using open-source intelligence, lawfare, and sanctions to disrupt maritime trade, not direct military confrontation, to cripple the Kremlin’s war economy.