Chinese firms dominate Iraq’s upstream sector by accepting low-profit terms, while state-backed financing secures critical infrastructure deals. Baghdad also seeks Western investment for technical expertise and to mitigate U.S. sanctions risk, maintaining a dual-track strategy to balance energy partners.
Browsing: Iraq
The agreement requires monthly renewals and expires in December 2025, reflecting deep political distrust. While providing short-term fiscal relief, its long-term viability is threatened by electoral politics, budget disputes, and the need for a new pipeline treaty with Turkey by 2026.
Al-Maliki’s candidacy reflects Iran’s need for a strong, reliable partner in Baghdad to manage its security and economic interests. Despite internal pressures, Tehran retains deep institutional influence in Iraq, demonstrating that the country’s stability remains precariously tied to external rivalries.
Maliki is seen as a weak, Iranian-backed figure whose return would reignite Shiite infighting, Sunni alienation, and Kurdish secessionist tendencies. His premiership would likely lead to renewed violence, international isolation, and a dangerous regression to the pre-ISIS era of state collapse.
Al-Sudani is using major oil deals with U.S. firms as a shield against potential sanctions and a tool to lobby Washington. His administrative effectiveness has fast-tracked deals, but his political survival post-election is uncertain, risking a return to bureaucratic gridlock.
Maliki’s return risks reviving Iraq’s cycle of polarization and instability, undermining fragile progress.
Maliki’s controversial two-term premiership entrenched corruption and sectarianism, leading to ISIS’s rise. While Iran supported his nomination, Trump’ unequivocal opposition forced Iraq’s Shia coalition into a stark choice: withdraw his candidacy or risk major U.S. political and economic consequences.
Iraq’s reliance on affordable Chinese goods and investment, paired with political alignment among Shia elites, embeds Beijing’s long-term influence. However, Baghdad maintains critical security and financial ties to the U.S., reflecting a constrained hedging strategy.
The proposed changes would permit sect-based jurisprudence on marriage, divorce, and inheritance, eroding legal equality and state oversight. Critics warn this institutionalizes sectarianism, parallels the security role of militias, and risks reversing decades of progress on human rights.
All five acts of genocide under international law were committed against Yezidis, yet prosecutions remain scarce. With mass graves still unexhumed and thousands displaced, the community’s future hinges on genuine political will for justice, safety, and reconstruction in Sinjar.